🧑⚖️ Advocate Sushil Kumar Saha – Profile & Notable Work
Professional Overview
Advocate Sushil Kumar Saha practices at the Delhi Bar Association and across courts in Delhi/NCR, with approximately 8 years of experience in handling commercial, corporate, intellectual property, arbitration, debt recovery, and partnership dispute matters The Indian Express+12GetLaw+12SoOLEGAL+12. His expertise includes company law, DRT proceedings, documentation, and trademark/patent issues GetLaw.
Additional sources suggest his affiliation with Menon Verma LLP, where he brings over 22 years of experience, focusing notably on criminal and matrimonial cases in various courts in Delhi/NCR menonverma.com.
📌 Landmark Case: UCO Bank & Others v. Sushil Kumar Saha (2012)
In a widely cited Supreme Court judgment dated October 15, 2012, S.K. Saha featured as the respondent in a crucial administrative law matter concerning internal bank disciplinary proceedings supremetoday.ai+2CaseMine+2menonverma.com+2.
-
The issue: whether the disciplinary authority from an employee’s original posting can continue proceedings after transfer.
-
The Calcutta High Court had invalidated disciplinary action taken by a later authority.
-
However, the Supreme Court overruled that decision, confirming that the original disciplinary authority (e.g., AGM) retained jurisdiction even after transfer — given regulatory amendments explicitly permitting such continuity CaseMine.
This judgment reaffirmed the legitimacy of internal disciplinary frameworks, especially those amended to facilitate efficient and informed decision-making within decentralized institutions like UCO Bank CaseMine+1supremetoday.ai+1.
⚖️ Other Relevant Proceedings & Legal Involvement
-
In the Jharkhand High Court, Sushil Kumar Saha appears as Petitioner in multiple writ petitions (e.g., W.P. (S) No. 225 of 2021), challenging provisions of the MECON employees’ group pension scheme regarding denial of pension where litigation exists between employee and employer. The Court allowed the petitions and struck down Clause 10(3)(iv) of the policy as violative of Articles 14 and 300‑A of the Constitution CaseMine.
-
Earlier civil litigation includes a 1992 case where Sushil Kumar Saha petitioned to set aside an ex-parte decree concerning land possession, arguing improper service of summons. Despite initial rejections, the court found merit in his claims about misuse of summons delivery under CPC Order V Rule 17 and allowed setting aside the decree Indian Kanoon.
🧾 Areas of Expertise
| Practice Area | Details |
|---|---|
| Commercial & Corporate Law | Partnerships, company registration, documentation, IPR |
| Banking & Employment Issues | Disciplinary proceedings, pension schemes |
| Civil Procedure & Land Cases | Suits, ex parte decrees, service of summons |
| Criminal & Matrimonial Work | (via Menon Verma LLP) Family disputes, criminal litigation |
He has been engaged in high‑impact litigation that shaped legal clarity around internal jurisdiction rules, employee rights, and constitutional guarantees.
💼 Legal Strengths
-
Strategic litigation: Saha has taken on cases questioning institutional authority and procedural fairness, often leading to precedent-setting rulings in his favour.
-
Versatility: Experience across civil, commercial, criminal, and administrative arenas offers him breadth in legal handling.
-
Focus on documentation and procedure: His success in ex‑parte and disciplinary matter litigation suggests careful attention to statutory compliance and record-based advocacy.
📚 Suggested Further Reading
-
Case study on UCO Bank And Others v. S.K. Saha (Supreme Court, 2012) – landmark reasoning on disciplinary jurisdiction GetLawmenonverma.com+1lawrato.com+1.
-
Writ petitions in Jharkhand HC (2023) on employee pension entitlements under MECON scheme – demonstrating constitutional analysis under Articles 14 and 300‑A CaseMine.
-
Civil suit procedural challenge (1992) – examining proper service of summons and Order V Rule 17 compliance Indian Kanoon.
✅ Conclusion
Advocate Sushil Kumar Saha is a seasoned legal practitioner with a solid profile in disciplinary law, employee rights, corporate litigation, and civil procedure. His impact cases deliver clarity on the interplay between internal regulations and statutory authority—making him a trusted counsel in nuanced legal arenas.
Comments
Post a Comment